Has potential but needs a copy editor

The inaugural issue left me feeling "meh." Dont get me wrong — the photographs were wonderful and what I could bear to read of the articles was good. However, I found it exhausting to read through the poor grammar, poor language mechanics, and gray-on-black type. This magazine appears to have a lot of potential. Perhaps that potential is realized in subsequent issues but how is one to know? The previews of the three most recent issues give me the impression that theyre from the bottom of the barrel. My suspicion is that the other articles in those issues are more substantive but locked behind a paid subscription in an effort to induce people to pay. I will gladly pay for a subscription if I know that I will get a product of sufficient quality. The one and only full issue on which I can base my decision does not meet the bar.

Dr. Jekyle [sic] about Bokeh Digital Photography Magazine Business Tips